… OpenStreetMap

January 12, 2011 at 2:10 pm 4 comments

In my endeavors to get open data on public toilets in existence for the benefit of, erm, everyone, I regularly consider the potential of OpenStreetMap.

OpenStreetMap

For anyone who doesn’t know, (and for those that do, feel free to skip my ill-informed explanation..) OpenStreetMap is a map of the country that’s created by members of the public. This began because Ordinance Survey data (along with other maps like those used by Google and SatNavs) was private and expensive and couldn’t be enhanced (or in some cases corrected) by you or me.

They created it by walking around with their personal GPS systems, logging data and adding it to the online map. It struck me as remarkably geeky, not to mention slow progress. Yet when I learnt about it in 2007 due to my MA Industrial Design Engineering project (self-promotion), a skeleton map of Britain was emerging.

Now they seem to be using satellite images provided by Yahoo as well, meaning people no longer have to have a GPS and traipse the streets. Instead you can just go online, log-in, and trace, colour and label the satellite images, thus creating a map. Consequently a huge leap forward has been made in the last few years – it’s looking pretty complete and I’m starting to see it used on websites instead of Google Maps. I’m sure you have to, perhaps without realising it.

… and Public Toilets

One of the things that can be added to the map is a public toilet. The map above, centered on London Bridge, has a few examples (you can click on it then zoom in via the next window. I couldn’t get the map to embed directly). As I’m not remotely proficient in OpenStreetMap it’s hard for me to analyse the quality of this data. I’ve no doubt these toilets exist and are accurately located as that’s the entire ethos of the project.

But I suspect in most instances, like here, there’s no additional information (male/female/unisex/baby-changing/payment/opening-hours) even though the interface does allow for this. I assume this is because OpenStreetMappers are not as ‘into’ public toilets as you or me. Their loss :)

Public toilets are added as a ‘node’, and via the OpenStreetMap wiki I downloaded the dataset as an xml. I haven’t got a clue what to do with this, but the significant thing was it has about 20000 nodes (therefore 20000 toilets?). Not sure if this is worldwide. Or partial-worldwide. Hmm… Still, it’s promising.

(ooh – comments 10 & 11 on ‘The Great British Public Toilet Map‘ answers this, and links to a map showing OpenStreetMap public toilets for London! thanks to Gregory Marler)

A better way for me to evaluate the data is to use Elbatrop’s public toilet app Find Toilets, as this was built using OpenStreetMap data. It allows the public to add additional information about public toilets (and, I think, additional toilets) and shares this information back with OpenStreetMap.

…and so?

As anyone can add public toilet data, and there’s the option to include extra information, why not just add the public toilets of Britain directly to OpenStreetMap instead of creating the Great British Public Toilet Map?

I’m very open to debate on this as I keep reevaluating my arguments for and against. But so far:

Reasons for TGBPTM (hmm, catchy..)

  • Public Participation

Anyone can add data to OpenStreetMap but it’s not the most user-friendly of websites. Don’t get me wrong, it’s improved dramatically and by logging on, reading the instructions and clicking some buttons I could draw lines on the London Bridge area map within the hour (then hastily click ‘Do Not Save These Changes’). But I couldn’t email my mum and say ‘add the village toilets to OSM! <link>’. She’d open it. Then close it. End Of.

The other thing I like about TGBPTM is that it will explain the issue of both public toilet information and open data in a way that the public can understand.

The third thing would be the intended ability to ‘take action’ by emailing your council directly. Asking the public to email (or letter-write) is several pegs down the Scary-Scale than asking them to edit an online wiki-map.

  • Accurate & complete data

This accuracy point is not a criticism of OSM at all. However some toilet apps allow people to add public toilets unmoderated, which may mean they’re not public toilets; they’re toilets in a business that may or may not be for customer use only. Or they may be in someone’s house. Or entered incorrectly and someone’s forgotten to delete it. Etc.

The second point, complete data, does come back to OSM, which lacks the motivation (currently) to add (and maintain) information on opening hours and facilities. This is information that I still believe is best coming from the council since they’re in control of such things. Naturally councils will differ Wildly in their ability to do this.

  • Community Toilet Schemes

This is fast becoming my justification for everything. Community Toilet Schemes are where councils pay local businesses a small yearly grant (I’ve seen between £300-£1000 offered. Of £0 if they’re a megacorp. Or the Town Hall) in exchange for the business allowing anyone, customer or not, to use their toilet during opening hours. They’re growing in popularity because they’re cheap (Generally the council announces the scheme whilst simultaneously closing a few permanent, expensive and ill-used public loos). It’s advertised on the council website, by a sticker in the window of the business (which is sometimes the cause of contention) and occasionally by printed maps, or even permanent fingerposts in the case of Richmond-upon-Thames.

These ways of informing the public of the Community Toilet Scheme toilets I find unsatisfactory for various reasons which I’m determined not to go into now, however the provision could be vastly improved by including these loos in the open data. The CTS data is likely to change much more frequently than permanent buildings when businesses join and leave the schemes, so needs the responsiveness of open data (and council commitment to maintaining it, though it’s in their best interests to do so).

I don’t know how responsive OSM can be to any toilet data down to the level of CTS participants or opening hours when it’s just the OSM community, open though it is, adding it (though compared to the responsiveness of councils?! What am I talking about?!). Apps like the Elbatrop one which have a simple public interface could be a way around it.

And OSM nodes don’t extend to CTS, though I’m sure they’d consider it.

Reasons for OSM

  • It already exists.
  • And works.
  • It doesn’t require me finding funding
  • It’s global, oooh!
  • All the data is in the same format…

The Great British Public Toilet Map, which currently consists of a folder with 8 datasets in it, has found or received data in 3 different formats, each with different columns and information and data types. It will require some processing to turn each dataset into something useful and plottable on the map. The website plans to include suggested guidelines for toilet data for the idealistic council-types, but doesn’t expect everyone to comply (taking the ‘anything is better than nothing’ approach).

Once the data is on the map it can be exported as cleaned-up data for use in maps/apps. But there’s probably a level of long-term maintenance in transforming the data.

Adding data directly to OSM avoids this.

So…

  1. I’m still in love with the public participation element of my idea. I don’t believe that the public can engage directly with OSM or could add toilets to OSM.
  2. There’s still a need, I believe, to engage councils to publish open data. And the best way to do this is by engaging their residents.
  3. Could data from TGBPTM be added to OSM, Elbatrop-style? Or from the council datasets directly? Is there a point? or are we adding too many middlemen?

I began today with a tweet:

GaillyK: Dear World, I’ve a question, re: #opendata Public Toilet Map bit.ly/eYG4gC. Should I ditch it + push toilet info on OpenStreetMap?

4 hours and 1000 words later I’m no nearer answering it, though I suspect it’s not an Either/Or situation. (I think some of those who read the original tweet may not have read it as Either/Or either, which has saved them A Lot of time).

However OpenStreetMap people have been discussing it, commenting and being generally helpful and enthusiastic (bits of this post are already out of date!)

So clearly this is just the beginning…

(UPDATE: Some of these issues have been addressed in this blog post by an OpenStreetMapper (and recent creator of a London Toilet Map using the existing data), in particular, ideas for how the public can get involved adding public toilets without tackling the OpenStreetMap site)

Advertisements

Entry filed under: Open Data. Tags: , , , .

Idea #6: The Great British Public Toilet Map … the Greater London Authority

4 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Gregory Marler  |  January 12, 2011 at 3:02 pm

    I’m glad you only seem interested in the static information of toilets. If you wanted to say which toilets are badly maintained/cleaner or which have. This would be best for a separate database (and maybe a voting/commenting type system).

    But if you use all the location data in OSM, you could build a system/webpage that is easy to click on a toilet and add extra information. So long as there is a note to the users saying they agree, the data can be fed back into OSM. I’m very interested in making such a system, but it would require more time/focus than I can spend being distracted form my uni project.

    Oh, uni distractions? I’ve whipped up a map showing 162 toilets in London for you. http://www.livingwithdragons.com/maps/toilets/
    Add markers.txt and you have a tab-separated table that you could use in Excel/OpenOffice. Give credit to OSM where you use it.

    Reply
    • 2. Gail Knight  |  January 13, 2011 at 2:14 pm

      Hi Gregory,

      Thanks for your enthusiasm with all this!

      I’m pretty excited by the prospect of people being able to rate & comment on public toilets, not least because in theory it could provide real-time communication between user and provider (like a ‘remote toilet attendant’) but that’s definitely for (someone else’s) site or app down the line.

      In fact two existing apps (SitOrSquat, WaterAid’s Toiletfinder) do do this; but the data on where the public toilets are isn’t there in the first place (both rely on crowd-sourcing).

      Importing the data from OSM could beef up TGBPTM considerably, and by attributing it thus it’s showing the Local Authorities up for not providing it themselves… hmm…

      Your map’s ace. Sorry for the distraction :)

      Reply
  • 3. Tom Chance  |  January 25, 2011 at 9:52 am

    Gail,

    I would suggest that the OpenStreetMap database is the ideal place to collect open data and crowdsourced data, but that you need a GBPTM interface.

    Have a look at: http://www.openecomaps.co.uk

    I’ve been developing a tool that sucks out interesting data for local environmental groups and drops it into KML files. They can then be displayed in any Google Map, or embedded using a simple map hosted on the web site. I’ve also customised the new, slightly easier-to-use Potlatch 2 editor to focus on those features. I’m almost ready to launch it…

    What’s more, I’ve used open data that I’ve wheedled out of various places including the GLA to populate the map alongside the crowdsourced data. All in one place.

    You could do something similar for TGBPTM.

    Reply
  • 4. Andy Mabbett (@pigsonthewing)  |  January 26, 2011 at 4:42 pm

    I’m a big fan (and occasional editor) of OpenStreetMap. I definitely think it’s the way to go – put the data in an open, editable repository, and let others map (or otherwise reuse) it as they see fit.

    The distinction between database of geographical data and a rendered map is an important distinction, in this context.

    Someone recently made a similar request on the GB mailing list, about mapping waterways and associated features. The responses they got both cover the generic technology; and show how helpful people can be. Why not sign up to that list, and see who can help you?

    If you want to edit the map, I mean database, yourself, there will be local meetings, near you, to help you get started. Again, the mailing list will help you find these. Caution: it’s addictive!

    Oh, and I don’t think OSM people lack motivation in any regard, there’s just so much to do!

    Happy mapping!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Inclusive Design Guide

.

Sorry, there's a problem with this image

Recent Posts

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,238 other followers

Blog Stats

  • 42,035 hits

%d bloggers like this: